Apart from India, many other countries that offer distance education learning programs such as distance education in the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Germany, Spain, Italy. When you surf the internet and search on Google, you’ll be a lot of distance education in universities abroad. Like the University Northcentral University, University of Massachusetts Boston, University of Florida, Kelley School of Business, University of Derby, Robert Gordon University, University of London is famous for several universities distance education from abroad.

Distance Education is the average education in a learning environment where students hope they get the minimum time for education in which their best efforts in learning their material. On the other hand students have enough time remained for education where they can easily be placed six to eight hours of study in universities and colleges that do not exist in distance education. distance education students enrolled in multiple activities so they have very limited time for education and at the same time they also need to improve their knowledgege when to enroll in courses at a higher level with more experience without leaving your present job.

In higher education, students gain entrance to universities and colleges where they can explore more about their career fields and learn how they can move further in their profession. In India the population in general is always interested to learn and 25 to 27 years the average age when people continue to learn in their career. This is one of the main points that enabLe Indian universities to be listed in the leading universities in the world. In the Indian students will find various universities as public universities, university centers, universities are considered, the open universities, private universities and colleges of agriculture. All universities offer various courses, Indian distance education, education, mba, online degrees in India, career programs and more.

Government India also invested a large amount of funds in the education sector where the University Grants Commission of India is a body of authority which supports the government and colleges and universities only authority which grants recognition to Indian universities. On the other side of the All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) is the authority that handles the technical education system in this country. In addition there is another body known as the Association of Indian Universities which acts as a communication between government agencies and universities in India.

* Batches already in existence may be reviewed

* NIH says rules reflect broad public support (Adds reaction from Republican opponent, paragraph 9)

WASHINGTON, July 6 (Reuters) – The U.S. government released new rules on Monday governing federally funded research on human embryonic stem cells, loosening some ethical requirements that scientists said could have cost them a decade of work.

The rules, which take effect on Tuesday, keep many existing restrictions on the research. U.S. federal funds may still not be used to actually make the cells using human embryos — only to work with the cells after someone else has made them.

But the National Institutes of Health, which issued the rules, eased some of the measures in the initial guidelines drawn up in March, including the so-called “informed consent” requirements meant to ensure that people who donated embryos for research knew exactly what they might be used for.

“We allow a case-by-case review,” acting NIH director Dr. Raynard Kington told reporters in a telephone briefing.

In March, President Barack Obama lifted restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research that had been put in place by his predecessor, former president George W. Bush and asked the NIH to draw up new guidelines.

Stem cell company stocks did not move much on news of the new rules, in part because the changes mostly affect academic researchers who rely on federal funding for their work.

The NIH guidelines take into account many of the arguments put forward during nearly 10 years of debate over how best to use the potential of human embryonic stem cells, which have the power to give rise to all the cells and tissues in the body and which supporters hope can transform medicine.

Opponents say it is wrong to destroy human embryos for any reason.

“The administration’s decision to dramatically expand the number of stem cell lines derived from human embryos and create incentives for the destruction of human life is a provocative step beyond what the president proposed just months ago and yet another sign that he has quickly retreated from his promise to be a president for all Americans,” House of Representatives Republican leader John Boehner said in a statement.

However, over the years Congress reached a middle ground, with many social conservatives such as Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch supporting such research if it used embryos left over at fertility clinics.

BROAD PUBLIC SUPPORT

“The guidelines reflect the broad public support for federal funding of research using human embryonic stem cells created from such embryos based on wide and diverse debate on the topic in Congress and elsewhere,” the new rules say.

They limit such research to these in vitro fertilization or IVF leftovers but also loosen restrictions on using human embryonic stem cells made in other countries.

In April when the initial guidelines were published some scientists said the “informed consent” rules on educating embryo donors were so strict that they might force labs to discard valuable stem cell batches, called lines.

“The draft guidelines that were released were so restrictive that I feared the vast majority of lines would be excluded,” Dr. George Daley of Harvard University in Massachusetts said in a telephone interview. He said the revised rules answer his concerns.

“It is the most that the administration can offer under current law,” said Dr. John Gearhart, a stem cell expert at the University of Pennsylvania. “There are many ‘new’ cell lines that have exceptional properties and have been maintained under better conditions that will meet the criteria of use.”

The rules create in effect the first official federal oversight of human embryonic stem cell research, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine said.

Hwang, once a scientist with rock-star like status in South Korea for his research that brought the country to the forefront of stem cell studies, is facing trial on charges of fraud, misusing 2.8 billion won ($2.25 million) in state funds and violating bioethics laws.

Prosecutors said Hwang brought shame to the country and harm to scientific research in South Korea.

“The disappointment felt by the (Korean) people is enormous,” one of the team of prosecutors told the court.

Hwang, who has apologized for fraud in his team’s work, has denied any wrongdoing and said he was duped by junior researchers into believing the landmark results

Lee Bong-gu, a lawyer for Hwang, said: “These people, including the prosecutors are trying to tear apart Hwang’s precious scientific evidence.”

Hwang’s trial at a nondescript Seoul court has been going on for about three years, and could stretch into a fourth, legal experts said. It has been bogged down in the technical testimony from scores of scientists about the research done by his team.

His supporters have staged emotional rallies over the years and filled the court for each of what are typically monthly hearings, saying Hwang is a scientific savior who should be given a second chance.

Hwang’s team was thought to have made two major breakthroughs in the field by cloning stem cells and tailoring them to a specific patient, which raised hopes of generating genetically specific tissue to repair damaged organs or treat diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

Stem cells are the body’s master cells, giving rise to all the tissues, organs and blood. Embryonic stem cells are considered the most powerful kinds of stem cells, as they have the potential to give rise to any type of tissue.

An investigation team at Seoul National University, where Hwang once worked, said in late 2005 that Hwang’s team deliberately fabricated vital data in the two papers on human embryonic stem cells.

It did verify, however, that Hwang’s team produced the world’s first cloned dog, an Afghan hound named Snuppy.

“Hwang’s fall discouraged the government from supporting stem cell studies. It also meant that researchers in the field were the objects of scorn,” said Oh Il-hwan, a Catholic University Medical school professor specializing in bioethics.

With major financial backing from his supporters, Hwang went on to form Sooam Biotech Research Foundation in 2006, which specializes in animal cloning and has produced cloned dogs.